Handrails
Third-Party Risk Management Tabletops

Test your critical third parties.

Test your whole critical-vendor list, not just a sample of five.

Quick, scoped to the actual contracted service, and easy enough that vendors actually finish. Generate audit-ready evidence for DORA, CPS 230 and third-party risk reviews - plus proof your suppliers are operationally ready to do business with your company.

Live · vendor session in progress
Live
Live · virtual47:32
Holly, the Handrails AI agent, facilitating a session
Speaking
Holly · Handrails AI
Maya · Vendor sec
Lin · Vendor CSM
Transcript
Holly
Where supplier assurance breaks

Why TPRM shouldn't stop at the questionnaire

01

Compliance, not resilience

Policies confirmed. Certifications collected. Once-a-year reviews against a generic checklist. Whether any of it works under stress, against the actual contracted service, is never tested.

02

Vendors are willing to do this with you

Most welcome the invitation. They need the same evidence for their own audits, regulators and customers. A Handrails session is the easiest yes on your TPRM program.

03

Ongoing, independent, evidence-based

Regulators are increasingly explicit: third-party assurance must be ongoing, scenario-based and independently verified. Annual reviews and vendor-supplied attestations no longer count as evidence on their own.

Why not just a questionnaire

Test the supplier. Don't just review the questionnaire.

Questionnaires confirm documentation exists. Handrails tests whether the supplier can actually respond, escalate and operate under pressure when it matters.
The old way

Questionnaire-based vendor assurance.

  • Annual questionnaire confirms policies exist
  • Generic responses rarely reflect the actual contracted service
  • Escalation paths, notification obligations and response responsibilities never exercised
  • First real test happens during a live incident
With Handrails

Continuous supplier readiness testing

  • Holly runs a live video session scoped to the actual contracted service
  • Contract obligations, escalation paths and response expectations actually exercised
  • Operational readiness evidence generated automatically during the session
  • Re-runnable on the cadence you set across your whole critical-vendor list

Often run alongside credentialing partners and consultancies who use Handrails to extend their own programs. See Partner with Handrails.

Third-party obligations

The operational controls regulators, enterprise customers and supply-chain partners increasingly expect to be tested.

Every simulation maps to a real obligation across third-party risk, operational resilience, supplier assurance, continuity and incident response readiness.
Supply-chain readiness
Supplier assuranceRetail & Enterprise
Continuously validated
Retail & enterprise third-party assurance · Programme requirements

Major retailers and enterprise customers increasingly expect suppliers to demonstrate operational readiness across recalls, escalation paths, continuity, cybersecurity, incident response and customer communication processes. Handrails helps companies test whether suppliers can actually respond under pressure, not just complete onboarding questionnaires and annual attestations.

If skipped: Supplier escalation failures, delayed incident response, customer disruption, retailer scrutiny and increased operational risk across the supply chain.
Defense supplier readiness
Supply chain assuranceDefense & CMMC
Continuously validated
Defense supply chain · Contractor & subcontractor operational assurance

Defense primes increasingly need evidence that subcontractors, technology providers and operational partners can respond under pressure across cybersecurity, continuity, escalation and incident response obligations. Handrails helps defense organizations test whether suppliers can actually operate within the requirements of modern defense supply chains, not just attest to policies on paper.

If skipped: Supplier control gaps, operational disruption, failed compliance reviews and increased scrutiny across the defense supply chain.
DORA
Business ContinuityEU under DORA
At least annually; TLPT every 3 years for significant entities

Regular testing of the ICT risk management framework and digital operational resilience, including scenario-based exercises with critical ICT third-party providers.

If skipped: Supervisory findings, remediation deadlines, administrative penalties under Art. 50.
CPS 230 + CPS 234
Third-party resilienceAPRA
Annual testing where required; CPS 234 notification timelines where applicable

Together, CPS 230 and CPS 234 require ongoing assurance that material service-provider controls hold under stress, including severe-but-plausible scenario testing, and that incident response involving outsourced arrangements involving client information can actually be evidenced, including notification timelines where they apply.

If skipped: Supervisory intervention; FAR consequences for accountable persons; remediation obligations for material provider failures.
How a Handrails tabletop runs

One process. Run it across your whole vendor list.

Invite the vendor. Holly runs the session. You receive the reports.
1Context in
Context
VendorCritical SaaS provider
ServiceCustomer identity / SSO
ContractBreach SLA · 24h
RegulatorsDORA · CPS 230 · CPS 234
IntegrationProd auth path
ScopeTop-20 vendor list
VendorCritical SaaS provider
ServiceCustomer identity / SSO
ContractBreach SLA · 24h
RegulatorsDORA · CPS 230 · CPS 234
IntegrationProd auth path
ScopeTop-20 vendor list
Vendor sideSec lead · CSM · IR
CadenceAnnual · per vendor
Duration45–60 minutes
OutputAudit-ready report · per vendor
Filed byClient TPRM team
Re-runSpot a gap, fix, confirm closure
Vendor sideSec lead · CSM · IR
CadenceAnnual · per vendor
Duration45–60 minutes
OutputAudit-ready report · per vendor
Filed byClient TPRM team
Re-runSpot a gap, fix, confirm closure

Scope it to the contracted service.

Upload the supplier contract and confirm the integration surface. Holly maps the contracted service, the data flows and the obligations on both sides. The scenario pressures the exact moment a vendor incident becomes yours.

2Virtual session
Live · virtual47:32
Holly, the Handrails AI agent, facilitating a session
Speaking
Holly · Handrails AI
Maya · Vendor sec
Lin · Vendor CSM
Transcript
Holly

Virtual session with the vendor

Holly hosts a live video call with the vendor's nominated team. Their security lead, their CSM, their incident responder, whoever owns the relationship from their side. Holly asks the questions, presses for evidence, requests screen-share where it matters, and keeps the clock so the session finishes inside the agreed window.

3Report out
Vendor tabletop · SSO providerReady
Breach-clause invocationNotification path & SLA confirmed
Token revocationRunbook produced, evidence attached
Customer comms timingVendor draft assumes 6h; contract says 2h
Regulator narrative ownershipNo clear DRI between Sec and CSM
Cooperation clauseTested with screen-share + log export

Report out

A standardised report mapped to your regulatory obligations, written while the call runs. The client receives the report; the vendor can review and sign off if you want. Re-run on the cadence you set, across the whole list.

What you walk away with

Apples-to-apples evidence across the base.

Audit-ready report per vendor

Mapped to the clauses in scope for your regulatory regime. Written while Holly runs the session. Filed straight into your TPRM evidence folder.

Contract-clause test log

Evidence of the breach-notification SLA, incident definition and cooperation clause actually being exercised. Not just that they exist on paper.

Comparable gap analysis across the base

Every vendor on the same axes. Boards and regulators get a single view of where your critical-vendor exposure actually sits.

Re-run baseline

Spot a gap. Fix it. Re-run the session. Confirm closure. Resilience as a living program, not an annual one-off.

Run this if you...

Turn supplier assurance into continuous readiness testing.

Manage critical suppliers across retail, enterprise, defence or regulated environments
Need proof suppliers can actually respond under pressure, not just complete questionnaires
Depend on vendors for continuity, escalation, incident response or customer operations
Want evidence of supplier readiness before the next disruption, outage or compliance review

Continuously test the resilience of your supplier network.

Run scalable simulations across suppliers, outsourced providers and critical partners.